REGULAR BOARD MEETING
Monday,
December 2, 2013
Randy Douglas,
Chairman
William
Ferebee-Vice-Chairman
Chairman Douglas
called this Regular Board Meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. with a salute to the
flag. Upon roll-call, the following
Supervisors were found in attendance:
Margaret Bartley, Dave Blades, Dan Connell, Randy Douglas, Bill Ferebee,
Charles Harrington, Ed Hatch, Debra Malaney, Michael Marnell, Sue
Montgomery-Corey, Ron Moore, Jerry Morrow, Roby Politi, Randy Preston, Tom
Scozzafava and Charlie Whitson.
Sharon Boisen and George Canon were
previously excused.
Department Heads
present were: Richard Cutting, Michael
Diskin, Monica Feeley, Judy Garrison, Deborah Gifford, Charlie Lewis, Dan
Manning, Mike Mascarenas and Dan Palmer.
News Media present
were: Jessica Collier – Adirondack Enterprise, Keith Lodbell – Denton
Publications and Lohr McKinstry - Press Republican.
Also present were: Ed Gardner – Supervisor Elect Town of Essex,
Bill Grinnell – Supervisor Elect Town of Ticonderoga, Tom Murphy, Michael
Blaise, Sue Allott, Jill Rock – Adirondack Health Institute, Joslyn Blanchard –
Southern Adirondack Independent Living Center, Tom McCabe – Capital
Digitronics, David Johnston and Win Belanger.
DOUGLAS: I will call this regular board meeting to
order and ask you to join me in the pledge to the flag. I know you did it at the Public Hearing but I
would like to do it again. We do have
some scheduled guests and then we have others that asked to speak.
Actually let’s do
roll call please Judy. Also in
attendance with us today we have Honorable Assemblyman Dan Stec and I would ask
someone to give courtesy of the floor to him.
Moved by Mr. Ferebee, seconded by Mr. Morrow. All in favor, any opposed? Motion carried. Honorable Assemblyman please come on up.
STEC: Thanks Chairman. I just wanted to pop in
today and certainly wish everyone a belated Happy Thanksgiving. I think we all have a lot to be thankful for
and certainly coming from County Government myself I know what time of year it
is for you and certainly have been talking to a lot of you and lot of my fellow
public servants around the district about budget time and the challenges that
you face a lot of which are out of your control and not brought on by you but
certainly put on you by the State of New York and we are trying to do what we
can down on that front but I wanted to just catch you at the tail end of my
first year and thank each and every one of you supervisors and certainly the
staff as well as the Treasurer and the Sheriff are here I saw them for the work
that you do here and also for helping make my transition into my new role as
painless as I think it possible could have been. I’m very pleased with the work that we
collectively did this year both in the chamber and then outside the chamber
working on more local issues and I think the two most noteworthy for Essex
County certainly would be the successful submission of the Proposition #5 to
the voters and of course its passage which in my opinion was a very easy vote
and certainly if you look at the numbers around the Adirondack Park, the voters
in the Adirondack park certainly saw it that way more than 2 to 1 were in favor
here because I view it as a win, win for not only the forest preserve from an
environmental perspective but certainly from an economic perspective. And when you are a public servant like we are
you absolutely have to balance both of those needs you can’t look at it just
from an environmental perspective or just from a job’s perspective. You need to try and look at the whole field
and I think that we’ve done that here and I’m very pleased that my colleagues
in the
Assembly saw it that way and moved it forward and of
course we were all delighted that it passed on election day.
And then more recently than that and perhaps more
exciting on a lot of levels it is certainly something that touches a lot more people
is the finding of funding for the Whiteface Veterans Memorial Highway. That was an issue that was long time coming a
lot of discussion and a lot of lobbying over the years by a lot of people but I
think as the Governor pointed out the other day we had the right nexus’s at the
right moment in Albany and I think its been covered adequately in the press but
personally I wanted to make sure that three people in this room are recognized
for their efforts because I was there and I saw how they lobbied for this
effort but certainly Supervisor Douglas, Supervisor Ferebee and Supervisor
Preston lobbied the Governor very effectively on a couple of different
occasions and I again that’s how Government ought to work. Is when something
comes together and its viewed on its own merits on a case by case basis and
certainly you did not need to be a civil engineer to know that road was in
tough shape and needed a significant amount of funding so that was a big win
too and I was just delighted to be a part of that with you all but it’s been a
very enjoyable and rewarding and challenging first year for me and I thank each
and every one of you for one, helping make it so and two for the fellowship and
the support you have given me this past year and I certainly look forward to
working with you next year. Thank you
very much Chairman.
DOUGLAS: Does anybody have any questions for
Assemblyman Stec?
Well, Dan I want to thank you on behalf of the Board
of Supervisors on how frequently you visit, how often you are in Essex County,
the touch of the phone you’re right there for our need, the quarter percent
sales tax that you worked so diligently with Senator Little, all our county
staff, Attorney Manning, County Treasurer Mike Diskin and County Manager Dan
Palmer. You worked efficiently to help
us get that extra ¼% that is much needed to help offset any future tax levy’s
it means somewhere around one and half to two million dollars we are estimating
right Dan? So without you that would not
have happened to I thank you for your efforts.
You’ve done a wonderful job as a freshman Assemblyman. Everybody that we talk to in Albany speaks
very, very highly of you and your efforts so thank you.
STEC: Well
thank you and I’m not sure that any elected official wants to take too much
credit for getting a tax increase through but certainly again, coming from a
local Government perspective and knowing what it’s like to work with a county
budget and where the revenues are going to come from there are merits to having
it come more from sales tax verses property tax. The answer to that is always I want it done
yesterday for free and none of us have figured out a way to do that yet so you’re
working with both sides of a balanced sheet trying to make expenses and
revenues work and when you are talking about revenues you need to weigh what
you did and I’m a big believer in home rule.
So from that perspective it was very easy to support the county’s
request and again, looking at the whole field and you look at the 62 counties
around the State after this year there will be only three counties left that
aren’t above 7% and the vast majority counties are already eight or higher so
for Essex County to say hey, we want to go from 7 ¾ to 8 again, knowing
everyone in this room and the effort that everyone put through this is not a
spend easy group here. You guys are very
tight with the buck, you’re frugal and you often don’t get enough credit for
being that way. Again it’s easy to take
a snapshot looking at a newspaper article but when you guys are working day in
and day out with the individual line items and a very challenging budget and
acknowledging that a vast majority of that stuff is not in your discretion
control but it’s mandated on you – you know it wasn’t an easy one to carry and
I think our timing was good that the mood in Albany was such that I think the
Governor and the Legislature realized that and Essex County was the only one
that got a sales tax increase but you were one of the lowest to begin with and
now you are almost to the State average.
I guess, you are very welcome.
Thank you.
DOUGLAS: The
only other thing I’d like to say about Dan and how accessible he is one time we
were preparing again for another disaster Mr. Ferebee and I in our towns for
possible flooding and Dan was hiking or about to go hiking and we called him to
assist us for a meeting with our emergency services and the hiking as important
as it is to him went on the waist side and he was at our town office to meet
with our emergency management office to plan and I really appreciated that
Dan. You are very accessible and we are
very fortunate to have you.
MORROW: I’m
sitting here thinking you want to say a few words and I’m thinking should I or
shouldn’t I? The answer is yes, of
course and I’ve known Dan before he ran for the Assembly. I knew Dan when I ran for the Assembly quite
a few years ago and he became a friend of mine and I’ve got to say the voters
couldn’t have chosen a better Assembly person than Dan and he not only is a
representative of Essex County but a friend to the Essex County voters and
constituents also in the Town of Chesterfield like you just said Randy about
being so close and how he gets back to you and stuff and when I have called him
and he’s been in meetings for our town not for the County but for our town he
has called me back I don’t care when it is.
He calls me at home or whatever he will get back to you that same day
and he cares about our problems because we do have problems as he said earlier
and I want to thank you for that Dan.
Thank you very much for not only being a representative of the people
but a friend of mine. Thank you.
STEC: Well you
are both very kind and I can’t begin to tell you what an honor it is for me to
be associated with Essex County and to represent you. Thank you.
SCOZZAFAVA: Dan
I was reading in yesterday’s Times Union I think it was, about the Governor’s
Tax Relief Commission, property tax and the Governor mentioned fleetingly
mentioned the possibility of the circuit breaker being enacted maybe one of the
recommendations from this commission. My
question would be any recommendations that come forth from this commission they
have to be approved by the Legislature also correct?
STEC: Yes.
SCOZZAFAVA: I
know the Senate has tried to pass the circuit breaker program for a number of
years and it always seems to go nowhere but it looks like the State may have
enough surplus this year to enact it. I
think the estimated cost was $2 billion?
It was a lot of money.
STEC: Yes. I suspect that the Governor would like to
include something like this as part of his budget package of budget bills as
opposed to a standalone bill it likely would be part of the budget
process. Certainly I’m in favor if we
have the means at the State level to pursue tax relief and the choice again
becomes between an income tax and a property tax I too would prefer and I think
it’s to the North Country’s great benefit if it’s in the form of dedication
towards property tax relief as opposed to income tax relief. Income tax relief I think greatly benefits
downstate and so property tax, you know that’s certainly something I too would
agree with the Governor I’d rather see his effort go to that than an income
tax.
SCOZZAFAVA: The
other issue that I just wanted to briefly mention, through the help of our
County Attorney as we are struggling with our budget here we were looking to
see if there was any authority for the County to create special districts. In other words I’ll use public safety as an
example in this radio system. There is a
lot of exempt property in Essex County, a lot of organizations that pay
absolutely no property tax whatsoever and you know if we were authorized to
create special districts these exemptions wouldn’t apply and then everybody
that’s benefiting from that service would pay towards the cost of that
service. So I think right now Dan there
was just a few areas I think water, sewer districts, refuse –
MANNING: Water, sewage, refuse, lake land protection
which there is no provision for, emergency services, special districts.
SCOZZAFAVA: So
the exemptions have a huge impact obviously on the levy and I just think it’s
something that the Legislature needs to address because you have many, many,
many property owners out there that pay no tax for any of these services.
STEC: That’s a
good point.
DOUGLAS:
Further comments, questions for Mr. Stec?
PRESTON: I was
going to bring this up later in the meeting I’ll do it now and I’ll try to be
brief. I wanted to thank everybody
involved with the Whiteface Highway.
When Dan had been in office I’d run into Dan all the time actually he’s
always around, he said well, how come I never hear from Wilmington? And I said well, when I really need something
you’ll hear from me and then the timing was right we made it a couple months in
the State without a natural disaster so then I reached out to him about the
Whiteface Highway and Dan was in with both feet and from that point forward he
was hands on with this Whiteface and he was involved in the thing when we
scoped out the Governor in Albany when Ferebee sat up where we cut across the
crowd over there to head him off at the path and it worked and I want to thank
you Dan for all the support you gave us and I want to thank you Chairman
Douglas and Mr. Ferebee who was with us on that conference and everyone else on
the board that supported that resolution and I would also point out that there
was a discussion that I didn’t agree with about conferences that was a $12 million
dollar conference that we went to, that we brought home because we made that
connection but Dan I really do appreciate what you’ve done for us. Thank you.
STEC: You’re
welcome. It’s hard to golf around here
in November so you’ve got to go to those conferences those are the two places
that things get done.
PRESTON: I also
want to – I would be remised if I didn’t bring up thanking Mr. Politi to allow
me to be up on the dais in his town and he sat in the audience so he told me
not to get used to that. It wouldn’t
happen again. Thank you.
FEREBEE: I
think it is also necessary to mention on that day Dan the Governor’s
announcement for the marriage of Clarkston University and Trudeau
Institute. Trudeau Institute had talked
about leaving the area which they employ about 80 people so the Governor
announced that day that Clarkston and Trudeau would merge. He’s earmarked I think it’s about $35 million
dollars over the next three years so that was a great boost for Saranac Lake
you know to keep Trudeau there, bring in some more youth, some more students
and keep the economy rolling there so I that was great for Saranac Lake.
STEC: I
agree. It was a good day for the North
Country.
DOUGLAS: One
thing about Whiteface Mountain Memorial Highway, Mr. Preston and I are meeting
with Sam Zhou tomorrow at 10:30 in Wilmington they are moving forward just met
with Mark Bonafide on another issue in the Town of Jay and they are definitely
moving forward so full steam ahead. Dan
thank you very much.
STEC: Thank
you.
DOUGLAS: Next
we have Sue Allott, Director of Preventive Services. Sue come on up.
ALLOTT: Hello I’m
here this morning to introduce to you the NYS Health Benefit Exchange market
place which we’ve all heard so much of in our recent news. I have with me today two health
navigators. One is from the Adirondack
Health Institute and the other one is from Southern Adirondack Independent
Living. They both chose green for the
color of packet to bring today so that’s why you have two green packets in
front of you. I did place on the packet
though a card that looks like this so if you turn this card over on the back
you can see, we put a sticker on there and this is something we did at Public
Health because we would like for our clients to have all of the options. So the sticker says Adirondack Health
Institute it has a number for them, Southern Adirondack Living and their
contact and then also here at Essex County at the Department of Social Services
people can sign up for their Medicaid benefits through the marketplace and they
have two certified application counselors over there and also a broker. I also gave the number here for Fidelis care
who has a certified application counselor to help people navigate that website
to sign up for their health insurance.
Now Fidelis is of course a private insurance company but you can’t buy
Fidelis insurance on the market place because they have not negotiated a
contract with our local hospitals. So
Fidelis right now is in the game for managed Medicaid. There are two types of managed Medicaid
available one is Fidelis the other one is United Health Care so all of these
navigators or certified application counselors have been through training. They all are sworn to be unbiased in their
enrollment services and to just give you a quick update on Adirondack Health
Institute they are formally known as Upper Hudson Enrollment Services. They represent collaboration between Hudson
Headwaters, Adirondack Health which is Adirondack Medical Center, and Champlain
Valley Physicians Hospital. So the
Adirondack Health Institute they have been doing facilitated enrollment for
insurance for fifteen years and they are currently using their health centers,
Hudson Headwaters Health Centers where would they be located? You’ve probably seen a few along the way.
SCOZZAFAVA:
Moriah, Schroon Lake and Ticonderoga.
ALLOTT: There
you go. Right, right so those are places
where AHI will have navigators and also Moses Ludington Hospital. They are
using those as home bases providing services in Franklin, Essex County,
Clinton, Warren, Washington and Saratoga so quite a wide range of counties they
are covering.
SAIL – Southern Adirondack Independent Living actually
I did not introduce to you the AHI person here is Jill Rock and she is here and
then for SAIL is Joslyn Blanchard and SAIL has been providing disability
related services for over twenty-five years in Southern Essex, Warren,
Washington, Saratoga and Hamilton Counties and SAIL provides in home assessment
and service authorization for people seeking insurance. So that is one of the difference between
these two entities is that SAIL will actually meet a person in their home to
assist them with insurance enrollment if they can’t get out to a site but
Fidelis will also do in home meetings or meet people at places that are
convenient to them.
I think that that’s it unless you have any questions
about the two specific federally funded enrollment services so SAIL and AHI
both have Federal grants to provide services in our county.
BLANCHARD:
Passed through the State Department of Health.
ALLOTT: I’m
sorry – through State. Come on up you
guys unless Maggie do you have a question for me?
BARTLEY: Yes I
was just wondering if you had any kind of written blurb that we could put on
our website and we could email out to people just so I’m looking at this
thinking I would hate to have to retype this and figure out what to put out for
people but the easiest way to put it is on our webpage as a place to start and
then it would take them to these various sites.
ALLOTT: It is
on our Public Health website so if you go to co.essex.ny.us/publichealth we do
have information on SAIL, AHI and we have links that will take you right
through.
BARTLEY: Can
you send the supervisors just maybe just a paragraph or maybe a blurb that will
link to that and what we should call it?
ALLOTT:
Sure. Okay.
BARTLEY: I’ll post it on my homepage.
ALLOTT:
Perfect. Great question.
DOUGLAS:
Anybody else have questions?
SCOZZAFAVA: Yes
originally there was going to be an outreach representative that was assigned
to Moriah at the town hall in Port Henry they were going to be there on
Wednesdays and then it didn’t happen. I’m
just curious as to why? Because we’ve
had phone calls and actually I think there was a couple of people you may have
met with?
BLANCHARD: We
have not yet received funding from the Department of Health and because there
is no cell phone connectivity we were unable to access Wi-Fi services so since
the website is completely internet based I think what we have done instead is
meeting in people’s homes in Moriah and if you have questions afterwards Hannah
is here and she is the one who has me in touch with Moriah and also will be the
one in the future to make future contact.
I know as soon as we have more of that technology that’s going to help
us quite a bit as far as being able to complete a completely web based
application in Essex County. Thank you.
SCOZZAFAVA: Thank you.
ALLOTT: Now
would you be willing to open up the courthouse or the town hall for
utilization?
SCOZZAFAVA:
That is what we planned to do.
ALLOTT: Because
there is access there.
SCOZZAFAVA:
Right that was the plan at the time and then I don’t know what
happened? I see they went to Crown Point
which is a good thing for Crown Point I guess but Moriah has like four times
the population of Crown Point.
BLANCHARD: We
definitely met with people in Moriah.
SCOZZAFAVA:
Okay thank you.
ROCK: And the
two packets are different but we do have somebody at the Moriah Health Center
and its like, totally not, we are doing the same thing but there are so many
people right now that need help that we’re just worried about getting the help
that they need. I just wanted to mention
one more thing that AHI does I’m actually – I went to the navigator training
but I’m actually not in the community doing the navigator enrollment services
stuff. I’m actually – in one of your
green packets there is a card with my name and I’m going around doing a lot of
trainings for your towns, I’m in libraries, I’m working with the chambers, so
if any of you want, any kind of it’s like an educational session on the market
place I’d be more than happy to come anywhere in your community and do that for
you. So I just wanted to mention that
and that’s a Federal grant. Somebody
asked me if I was doing it out of the kindness of my heart I said, I wish but
it’s a Federal grant to have people in your community to do that so I’d be
happy to do that for you.
SCOZZAFAVA: I’ve
got just one – are you reaching out to - there’s a situation I know of that
impacted a number of people in my town where an employer that they worked for
in Vermont they had health insurance through this employer, they dropped it
because it was less expensive for the employer to pay the fine and they
continued to provide to health insurance so I know that they are scrambling
right now trying to find a plan as crazy as it may sound these people had
insurance now they no longer have it.
BLANCHARD:
There’s been a lot of frustration with the implementation and as you
know any type of new policy being implemented is going to have backlash that
may not have been expected. One of those
backlashes in particular is the lack of health care that you can use in Vermont
and the cross over areas are struggling more than any other with the health
insurance roll out and what we’ve found there is some confusion on the State
level and with the providers regarding whether or not they are allowed to provide insurance and there is
some rule that no one has been able to get in writing for me that we are
fighting up against so we’ve made a direct advocacy attempt through Department
of Health we’ve documented evidence of both the conversation that we’ve had for
both representative in the policy in trying to increase the ability for people
to have health insurance coverage that would be accessible across state lines
because that is a really big issue. A
lot of people do use their primary care, have some level of cross over even if
they go to the hospital most typically in Vermont that is a big issue for them
but as far as employers dropping people, people losing health insurance
coverage from their healthy New York plans or having bought a private plan that
is not adequate and now that plan is now no longer available is a big concern
for a lot of the people calling us and every case is different. Everybody has a different situation and what
we find is we sit down with the application, we talk through their situation,
research all the options and really try to explore what is out there that most
people are able to find something that is at least adequate if not better than
what they had before.
SCOZZAFAVA: So
this is all part of the Obamacare obviously.
BLANCHARD: Yes.
ALLOTT: The
Affordable Care Act.
SCOZZAFAVA: The
Affordable Care Act because I do know a couple of people that went on that
website that didn’t have health insurance and by the time they got off it they
needed health insurance because it was just so frustrating.
BLANCHARD: Well
for example it was down at 8:00 this morning.
It was down at 9:00 this morning.
It was down at 10:00 this morning so there’s definitely some major
issues as far as that goes.
ROCK: Our New
York State one has always been a little bit above the Federal one which is
positive.
SCOZZAFAVA:
Right which is good. Thank you.
BLANCHARD: We
really did create a very complex capable body of information that is able to
identity proof people with almost no documentation and able to help people
reach an eligibility determination at a record speed which is very valuable and
it’s unique to New York State it’s nowhere else.
DOUGLAS: Does
anybody else have any questions? Thank
you very much all three of you I really appreciate it.
BLANCHARD:
Thank you.
DOUGLAS: Next
Bill do you want to offer the courtesy of floor?
FEREBEE: Sure.
Mr. Chairman if I could offer the courtesy of the floor to Tom McCabe
from Capital Digitronics. If you recall
at ways and means we did have Wells Communication was here. He did make some statements and we felt it
was necessary for Capital we grant the same time to come and talk about his
company and the installation of the county radios.
DOUGLAS: Do I have a second? Mr. Preston.
Under discussion? All in favor
signify by saying aye, any opposed?
Motion is carried.
Mr. McCabe if you are here please come forward.
McCABE: Mr.
Chairman, ladies and gentlemen of the board thank you for allowing me to speak
in front of you today concerning the award of the contract for installing the
counties mobile radios. My name is Tom
McCabe and I’m the President and CEO of Capital Digitronics Inc. Our company has been around since 1975. I’ve been doing this for almost 33 years now
and this is the first time that I can remember having to defend a low bid
proposal and yes, we are low bid by $26,000.
If awarded the contract by this board we would undertake the installation
of the Motorola county radios as per a bid response at significant cost savings
to the county now and in the future. We
have a track record of installing three hundred similar high powered radios for
NYS DOT and the counties between Albany and the Canadian border in addition we
have installed 80 of the XTL 2500 radios for the NYS Police in Saratoga county
which also by the way has a Motorola system not to mention many more for NYSEG,
the VA Hospital and others. NYSEG trucks
all have Motorola radios in them so if you see a NYSEG truck on the road it has
a Motorola radio that we service.
We will warrant our installation work for one year
backed by a performance bond if necessary.
Our lead installer who I brought with me today Mark Denise so you can
see what he looks like, is Motorola shop trained to install XTL 2500 radios and
ready to go to work. He has done many
dozens of these installs in his career.
Our other technicians are FCC licensed which is required by the State
Police, the NYS Thruway Authority and others.
The FCC general radio telephone operator’s license, GROL is the only
license actually issued by the Commission anymore for our line of work. It sets a higher bar and is more difficult to
obtain than a technician certification gotten through a correspondence
course. All of our technicians have many
years of experience and our managing technician from Glens Falls was part of
the Ground radio team for Air Force One for many years and that’s not an easy
place to work and it requires a lot of technical ability
We can buy genuine Motorola parts and installation
accessories from Motorola and have access through their technical assistance
center through the 800 number just like everyone else. We maintain a subscription to genuine
Motorola programing software and each of our technicians is issued a laptop and
the appropriate Motorola cables for programing.
NYSEG is the perfect example of that because we have to program their
Motorola radios almost every time we touch them.
Much has been made before this board about of the
Motorola warranty issue. Since the
standard Motorola parts and labor warranty for XTL radios expires after one
year the county bought the extended service plan for two additional years. Motorola has said they will not warrant
installation by others. No one would
expect them to. They would also not
warrant damage caused by in proper installation. No different than GE appliances not
warranting your new dryer because somehow you plugged it in backwards. Don’t call the Maytag repairman for that one
because he won’t want to hear about it.
We will warrant our own installation work thank you
and are willing to post a performance bond in the full amount of the contract
as proof of our intent. We will be
responsible for any depot repairs to a radio damaged by us.
Lastly as you are able to see from the handout that I
have given you we are your neighbors in Keene.
We were there for Hurricane Irene and I remember the Keene Fire
Department asking to park their vehicles in our parking lot because it was one
of the higher places in the Village and upstream from the creek. We were there
for the rebuilding as well and worked on the radio portion of the new Keene
Fire House installing antennas and installing cable to the radio room. We even donated a new $3,000.00, P25 base station
to the fire department which can be used on the new VHF system. Our own building in Keene has had some
improvements also. We put on a new roof,
put in new windows and garage doors and put up a beautiful new wood sign as the
picture shows on the cover of the brochure.
Now Charlie Segard wants the building back well, we’re
they to stay and we are in Essex County to stay. The old orange garage never looked so
good. We have hired people from Essex
County to work at our Keene shop and maybe looking to put more on the future if
business positions warrant it. The hand
out is there with more specific details of our handling of this project and we
look forward to working with you on it.
You can also visit our website at www.capitaldigits.com and Mark Denise is the lead installer and our
Motorola guy is here to answer any questions.
Thank you.
DOUGLAS: Does anybody have any questions?
SCOZZAFAVA: You mentioned that we, that the county
purchased a two year warranty?
McCABE: I think Mr.
Jaquish said it was good until 2015.
SCOZZAFAVA: You also said if I understood you correctly
that Motorola, is it a definite that Motorola will not honor the warranty?
McCABE: You have to ask Motorola on that.
SCOZZAFAVA: They have
told us because that is the question that hangs out there.
McCABE: The warranty is honored by the depot that the
radios got returned to. In other words,
if a radio has a problem the radio gets pulled out and sent to the depot
because it’s a separate service plan, it’s a depot hardware warranty that was
in the brochure so as far as we know if you send the radio down and the serial
number checks depending on that two year ESP on it they’ll fix it.
SCOZZAFAVA: How many employees do you have on hand for
the install? In other words if you were
awarded this contract do you have enough employees on hand to do all the
installations currently or would you have to bring on more people?
McCABE: No we have enough people now depending on how
staggered the work load is. We have two
guys who just went to Ogdensburg to study up there for a week to do DOT
installs so our guys travel any place between Albany and up and we have people
that are at the State Police that we can pull off if we needed them so we can
adjust our manpower as the need warrants.
I don’t imagine that they will be doing all of the installs at once.
SCOZZAFAVA: On the install on the RFP you’ve submitted
your proposal and if, how do you deal with additional costs? I mean I’m an electrician and you go to a job
and you always need to go to the van and add more parts or find something that
you’ve got to have to complete the installation are the additional parts and so
on is that also covered?
McCABE: Yes it completes one working installation and
I think the bid response also called for your labor rate for off contract
service.
SCOZZAFAVA: Right so if you run into a situation where
the install is not just a boiler plate install the price is the price is what I’m
saying.
McCABE: The price is the price. We looked at everything they put out on the
bid sheet which separated fire trucks from brush trucks from air boats to
pickup trucks so we priced all that out.
SCOZZAFAVA: Bench testing? Are the radios, I don’t even
know if the radios have been bench tested yet?
Or will be bench tested? Before
you do an install I would assume that they test the radio first on the bench to
make certain that the radio is going to operate and it’s at the same
frequencies and so on? I mean, I don’t
know? I’m asking you that question.
McCABE: Normally that’s done when they are
programming the radio.
SCOZZAFAVA: So that’s what I’m saying they come right
from the factory they’ve been checked out thoroughly?
McCABE: Yes they have been tested at the factory but
I think once I load the software in there which is particular to Essex County
because Essex County has a unique you know system for staggering the towers and
the multi zone and things like that they would be tested after the programing
goes into them also. I believe the
county; Mike Blaise is supposed to be talking about doing the programming.
SCOZZAFAVA: Now on a performance bond I guess this would
be a question for the County Attorney I mean, I don’t even know how much you
would ask to post for a performance bond on something like this?
MANNING: It’s usually the full contract price.
SCOZZAFAVA: And we
would expect that performance bond from either company I would assume?
MANNING: Yes. I usually have a threshold, a price threshold
whether we accept a performance bond or not and also the degree of difficulty
so this is a $100,000, we would have a performance bond in this case especially
since it’s an installation.
SCOZZAFAVA: Okay thank you.
MORROW: You kept mentioning XLT radios.
McCABE: XLT 2500 I believe is the model of the
radios.
MORROW: What’s the difference between them and the
P25 Astros that we have?
McCABE: The XLT 2500 is the radio itself the P25 is
the software that goes in it.
MORROW: Have you ever installed the P25?
McCABE: Oh sure we’ve done P25 systems for the City
of Troy. We did a P25 system for this
little place called Globalfoundaries that has a 3P25 digital truck system which
is actually unique so we’ve done a lot of 3P25’s also.
MORROW: I guess the question was asked from Mr.
Scozzafava but I’ll ask it again, how many CET’s certified technicians do you
have in Keene alone? Not bringing them
in from other places but in Keene?
McCABE: CET certified technician is a technician
standard that is favored by Motorola. We have FCC license. We have our lead technician in Keene who is
from Wilmington he has his FCC license.
The secondary installer in Keene is working on his FCC license. It takes normally three to four months of
study with the guy before he will even let you take the test and everybody from
Glens Falls which is only 45 minutes away, they all have FCC licenses and they
are up here all the time working on State Police and up to Blue Mountain. We do
all the mountain tops for the State Police and NYSEG so they’re up here all the
time.
MORROW: The only problem with that is and it said
right in your material that you gave us if you are calling in somebody from
Glens Falls or Albany you’ve got to pay for time so I would rather have
somebody that’s right in our county working.
McCABE: Under the rules that we follow for Harris and
the other people if there is any travel we only charge from the Keene Shop so
even if the guy has to travel from Glens Falls up here I don’t charge for that
it’s only Keene.
MORROW: I guess the other thing I would ask is Harris
Shop right, is that a competitor of Motorola?
McCABE: Everybody is a competitor of Motorola.
MORROW: Okay and I guess if Motorola would rather
have CET I guess that’s what I would look at and I was a big questioner last
week when Wells was here you know, I thought it was $29,000 now it’s even worse
it’s $26,000 which you know I have people they read the paper and thank god for
that and they come into my office and they’ll say yeah, but $29,000 is a lot of
money. I say, yeah on a $17 million
dollar system. We saved $100,000 on the
$30 million dollar jail and we are paying for it now that’s what worries me on
this. It’s $26,000 now you know, that
kind of worries me and I just want to make sure. Then I had another gentlemen come into my
office and I won’t say the companies but he installs satellite systems. He says I don’t see what the big deal is? I
says let me ask you a question, you install this brand of satellite systems he
says, yeah. Okay suppose somebody else
installs that same satellite system but they are not certified or not you know,
from that company will the satellite company warranty it? Hell no.
There’s where I’m coming from.
That’s what I’m worried about on a $17 million dollar system we’re
arguing over $26,000. I just can’t go
with it.
McCABE: Well $26,000 is the amount now but you’re
looking at a twenty year lifespan of this system okay and I believe over the
long run by having our shop here close and we have a half an hour response to
most places in the county it’s going to be cheaper for the long run. They have our guys response from here, no
travel charges and you’re doing business in the county as opposed to
Plattsburgh.
MORROW: Well can I just continue with that. You’re right on that and what you just said
is true it’s only $26,000 now but it could be a lot less in the future. I worry about $26,000 now being a lot more in
the future so you just said my point there thank you.
DOUGLAS: Further comments or questions?
FEREBEE: Question – in installing radios and
connecting them with Motorola previously had you any problems with your radios
and have you had any problems communicating with Motorola?
McCABE: No.
With the 80 radios that we installed for the State Police that
communicate with the Saratoga County Motorola system they work fine every zone
2 car in the State Police that operates in Saratoga County, they made a deal
with the county the county provided the radios through the State Police because
the State Police work for and pay for it themselves, we install them and they
work fine.
FEREBEE: Thank you.
POLITI: I love competition. Something just came up here that I want to
ask a question about and we’re talking about the issue at hand is the
installation of the radios alright, so let’s move on. Who’s going to program them? I heard Mike Blaise was going to program them
but I don’t think that that’s the case.
Now if Mike Blaise isn’t going to program them, he’s going to install
the radios who’s going to program them?
Are we going to have to RFP again for somebody to program the radios?
McCABE: We can program the radios at no charge.
POLITI: I’m just saying because this is not meant for
you sir but I’m asking really Dan.
PALMER: I assumed that the radios would be programed
by installer.
POLITI: But that was never part of the RFP?
PALMER: I don’t know Roby. I don’t have it in front of me the language.
POLITI: I don’t believe it was part of the RFP. Which now I’m a little concerned about
because now it sounds like we have an additional costs. It would seem to me that it’s logical that
the entity that installs the radio might also program the radio otherwise
potentially you’re going to have Motorola radios installed by Capital
Digitronics and programmed by Wells Communication which to me is kind of a
mishmash in terms of the entire project so I guess I’m somewhat concerned for
the board here in terms of the next step.
Should the RFP had included programing?
Is Mike doing the programming?
Would somebody confirm or deny that that’s the case and let’s go from
there at least with this question.
DOUGLAS: Dan are you looking at the RFP?
PALMER: I am.
SCOZZAFAVA: Mr. Chairman.
DOUGLAS: We are going to come back to that Dan is
going to look and check on the RFP to what the wording was on that. Anybody else on this side at this point?
PRESTON: I guess it’s not a question it’s just
basically a comment. The reason we went
out for RFP was to get the best possible price for the county and I guess I
could say if Wells was $26,000 less for the install I’d be probably be trying
to make my point in their behalf but again, I think they are both excellent companies
and do a great job but everything that I have read from the Capital Digitronics
I mean I see no reason why we would not award this to the low bidder? They seem to be very capable and on top of
that just realizing that the eyes that are going to be upon them they have a
shop in Keene in our own county if they fail at this it’s probably not going to
play out well for them. I think there is
extreme pressure that is going to be on them for them to perform and I’ve been
in the fire service for 36 years I’ve been around this stuff a long time. I found out some very interesting stuff over
the weekend. Lake Placid Fire Department
installs their own radios always have and I don’t know if they are worried
about what’s the story with the warranty but I found that out over the weekend
and also I kind of, the light bulb went off that the Emergency Services
Director in Clinton County programs all the radios and always have and they are
all Motorola’s so things get a little grey here and when they get grey they
come back to me. I looked at guy’s track
record and again, I’m not saying anything against Wells. I think Wells is an excellent company, very
capable but we did an RFP for a reason and I think the pressure is going to be
extreme on these people to perform and if they don’t they probably, may want to
relocate to some other county because I don’t think it’s going to play well for
them. I’m fully 100% supportive of
awarding this to the low bidder. Thanks.
FEREBEE: Mr. McCabe didn’t you just state that programming
the radio is included in your RFP?
Installation and programing?
McCABE: If we were given the template and we were
able to sit down with Motorola and work out how they wanted them programed
because it is their system the 300 radios for DOT they are vertex radios which
is owned by Motorola, we programed every one of those radios at the shop before
they go out and my technician has a line of radios going down the hall because
we’ve got 300 of them to do. So those
are programed, came out of the box plain vanilla we would need a template to do
it but we would not charge to do it it would be part of the installation.
FEREBEE: Thank you.
PALMER: That’s true of everybody. It says, the contract shall program the
mobile radios with Essex County radio programing template including basic and
local channels, program the mobile radios with other channels as directed by
the County on a case by case basis, perform problem protection and issue
resolution prepare and deliver radio installation and programing and
troubleshooting documentations. So
it’s part of the contract. They have to
program it and in order to program it you’re going to have to work with
Motorola that’s just going to be part of the process whoever you choose.
DOUGLAS: I think you answered it. You have worked with Motorola. Have you run into problems in the past with
any warranty issues or those things?
McCABE: No because the warranties are handled by the
depot. The warranties are not handled
locally.
DOUGLAS: Anybody else on this side?
SCOZZAFAVA: Can’t we make a call to Motorola and find out
if they are going to work with this contractor?
And if they don’t then we should call the Attorney General would be my
next phone call because it’s just not right.
You know we went through an RFP process here and I agree with Mr.
Preston and they came in $26,000, I guess the amount is. I don’t care if it was $16,000 or $6,000, the
bottom line is we went through an RFP process they submitted the low
proposal. They are in this business this
company, forget the fact that they are in Essex County. What does it do to our reliability in regards
to RFP’s in the future? I mean Motorola,
Wells Communication they do an excellent job.
They provided this County, my town, most towns within the county if not
all with excellent service but the bottom line is they were higher than the
other company it’s that simple. Now
Motorola they’ve got the radios, they’ve got it all. They don’t have it all but they want it all
and it’s just not right. This company
submitted the best proposal, the lowest proposal they are more than qualified
to do this installation and it should be awarded to them. This has become more political than it has in
regards to actual cost. That’s what’s
going on.
PALMER: You know what I don’t care what you guys
do. I said this before, I said it in
April but it isn’t just price and again I stand by the analysis that we did,
that Linda did out of the purchasing office there was points awarded a lot of
it was based upon training and those certifications that are available to
Motorola authorized dealers and it came out 95 to 93 but it still was the
recommendation to go with Wells. It’s
not political. It is the RFP
process. It is not entirely price it’s
based upon experience and what ultimately what we believe is in the best
interest of the county. I think we did a
fair and accurate job of it and I stand by the recommendation that we
made. If you don’t take it that’s not my
issue but I still stand by the recommendation we made.
DOUGLAS: Anything else Tom?
HATCH: I talked with our fire Chief and some other
members of the fire company they’re very satisfied with Wells Communication and
would like to stay with them if possible because they said they get excellent
service from them and they do handle all our town radios and our firemen’s
radios.
I brought it up the
other day and I will again not to be repetitious but I still think that the
County should be considering how to get out of the radio business as soon as
possible. I mean once these radios are
installed I would think you would want to get rid of the liability of them
because you’ve got 400 radios out there and you are going to be in the radio
business for a long time and I would think that you would want to turn those over
to the departments and let them be responsible for them. Thank you.
DOUGLAS: That’s a good point Mr. Hatch and if that is
the way this board chooses Dan can draw up a contract with each Emergency
Services department and say from here on out it would be your responsibility
for any repairs or issues that come forward from this at a certain point. You know we can take a time frame or what
have you. We would have a recommendation
from the Public Safety committee and Mr. Manning and Mr. Palmer and Dan would
draw up a contract if that’s what this board chooses but you bring up a valid
point.
I’m going to come to
you. I’m going down the line Tom.
Mr. Moore anything?
MOORE: It seems to me that this comes down to the
programming. I guess my only question
sir, do you feel confident that you can work with Motorola without any
difficulties to program these radios?
That’s the bottom line.
McCABE: Yes if they
provided the template we have no problem putting the template in, putting the
ID’s. I’m sure that the County already
has a template worked out like everybody else certain call letters are given
out for certain new ID’s and I know Kevin Ryan.
I’ve known Kevin Ryan since he worked for Wells. He’s the Motorola guy so I’ve been doing this
for 33 years. I’ve seen it all okay, I’ve
been there and we don’t have any problem working with them if they don’t have
any problem working with us.
MOORE: I would agree with Mr. Preston as well. I mean we’ve got 300 radios that you’ve
installed for the Department of Transportation, 80 for the Troop G State
Police, $26,000, I see no reason why we shouldn’t award this bid.
DOUGLAS: Mr. Harrington anything? Mr. Marnell?
MARNELL: I feel confident that they have the
capability. If they issued the State
Police radios the State Police rely on their radios almost every few minutes
around the clock there is an emergency somewhere and I’m sure if they had
problems they would be heard about it and they would be corrected or on the
line for it and also the $26,000, I’ve said this same thing at the town to the
board one day I said we discuss numbers in thousands and it’s too bad sometimes
we don’t pay it in cash and count the money out because $26,000 in twenties and
tens and fifties and hundreds is a lot of money and when you say $26,000 it
sounds easy to say it but it a substantial amount of money and I feel confident
that this company could handle this.
DOUGLAS: Thank you Mr. Marnell. Ms. Malaney.
MALANEY: Yes I feel the same way. Clearly they are experienced, willing to post
a performance bond, low bidder I support Capital Digitronics.
DOUGLAS: Mr. Whitson anything?
WHITSON: Not at this time no.
DOUGLAS: Mr. McCabe, Mr. Palmer showed me an email
that you sent and can you clarify this for us?
It’s an email that you sent on August 22. Dan can you read it please?
PALMER: Basically what you sent to Donna was I
downloaded the RFP from the website this morning, since we are competitors of
Motorola Solution and Wells I doubt that we’d be able to coordinate a work
study with Motorola……
POLITI: You know what I can’t hear.
SCOZZAFAVA: I can’t hear you Dan.
PALMER: Sorry.
I downloaded what it says, it was an email to Donna that says, I
downloaded the RFP from the website this morning since we are competitors of
both Motorola Solution and Wells I doubt that we’d be able to coordinate or
work with Motorola as the bid mandates as they would not want to hurt Wells by
allowing any competition for this project.
It goes on to say, County Government usually gets the best price
and the biggest bang for the buck when two or more companies compete for their
business while we are more than capable of filling the technical aspects of the
RFP we already do so for NYSEG, NYS Police and NYS DOT and we have an Essex
County facility in Keene I’m hesitant to respond because of the reasons stated
above.
DOUGLAS: You are welcome to respond sir.
McCABE: Well after getting a second read of the bid
and downloading the addendums and asking questions to Linda we felt more
comfortable in responding because most of the onus would be on us to make it
work and we’ve made Warren County work since 2002. We’ve put in the Warren County system from
when they had tin cans and strings holding it together so we have no compulsion
about taking it on but that was an early email at first read and we did have
some pertinent questions and she put out two addendums and we had no problems.
DOUGLAS: Thank you Mr. McCabe for clarify. Anything else from anybody?
SCOZZAFAVA: The only
concern that I have is when you replied, if they, being Motorola provides us
with the template for the programing.
McCABE: It’s the county’s radios they expect the
system to work you know they have to come up with a template.
SCOZZAFAVA: But the word if bothers me so do they have an
option not to do that? I mean that’s the
question I have.
McCABE: No the radios
won’t work and they wouldn’t get the system reception without it so.
SCOZZAFAVA: That’s the question that hangs out there and
then in regards to Mr. Palmer who has some valid concerns. I’ll tell one quick story, years ago they
were interviewing John Glenn on 60 Minutes and one of the questions asked of
him was, what were you thinking when you were sitting on the head of that
rocket ready to launch? And he said, the
only thought that kept going through my mind was that it was the low bidder
that built this thing.
McCABE: I think Mr.
Preston is right and we are willing to sit on the head of the rocket because we
think it’s a good long term fit for the county.
SCOZZAFAVA: Thank you.
DOUGLAS: Thank you Mr. McCabe.
MONTGOMERY-COREY: I just want to comment. I understand the logic about reading that
part of the email at the same time in RFP processes it’s not uncommon for
people to ask questions and for the same company to take a first pass at an RFP
and say, I’m not sure this is such a good fit and then go back through after
getting clarification and say, this is a good fit and we are a qualified bidder
and we should bid on this thing. So I
personally am not interested in holding that email against anyone. It sounds to me like a very preliminary
communication with the county and clearly this bidder went through and thought
through the process and got the clarification he needed to be able to compete
successfully.
PALMER: Again the only reason I read that was because
of the concern of whether they would be able to work with Motorola. They have that concern themselves and frankly
we as a county should have that concern as well.
POLITI: I guess my concern is we have spent millions
of dollars with Motorola. Millions of
dollars with Motorola and I don’t like the way that this is playing out quite
frankly. If Motorola is so concerned
about this company doing the business you know, I really want to hear that
because frankly for Motorola to get involved in with two competitors bids on a
radio system that this county has spent millions of dollars on in my opinion,
they’ve got some egg on their face to take sides if that’s all this is. So I’m interested personally in hearing from
them.
PALMER: The only
thing I would say about Motorola and again back in April I said to you, the
board had the option of going directly to Motorola and bypassing all the
dealers and just saying you know what Motorola is on State contract I’m going
to hire Motorola to do the install. Who Motorola uses to do that won’t be my
issue because I frankly will be contracted directly with Motorola and frankly I
felt at the time was the better option because there wouldn’t’ be anybody
saying, okay I did the install and that’s not my problem because we would have
contracted directly with Motorola off a State contract and it would have been
over.
DOUGLAS: Go ahead Roby are you going to follow up?
POLITI: No I don’t have a follow up. I guess I’m just dumb founded.
MORROW: Sitting here listening to reply to some of
the things. When you go out to RFP of
course you want the lower bid but you want the lowest most qualified bid that
meets the specs. If they don’t meet
specs then they are not the most qualified and you don’t go with them. That’s what an RFP is and when I listen to
somebody else saying, well if Motorola doesn’t work with this company we should
go to the Attorney General. You can go
to the Attorney General. You can go to
the President. It doesn’t matter. Companies who have products that they have
certified installers that work for them do not have to work with another
company. That’s done very day. It’s done every day. People have the certification to work for a
different company. I know this by
fact. Motorola does not have to work
with Capital and I’ve seen letters where they won’t work with Capital so we’ve
already heard from Motorola. I’ve seen
the letters saying they will not work with Capital or anybody else that’s not a
certified Motorola installer. Anybody
can buy parts anybody, I can buy parts doesn’t mean I’m an installer. This is a unique radio system. This is not
like Warren County’s or anybody else’s.
I don’t think from what I’ve heard and following this, this radio system
is not like the other ones, not like the State Police or anybody else. This is a separate radio system because of
Essex County, because of the terrain of Essex County so I still can’t go for
it.
DOUGLAS: Mr. McCabe do you anticipate if you were
awarded the bid having any issues with Motorola?
McCABE: No.
DOUGLAS: Anybody else on this side that I haven’t
heard?
BLADES: This is not a criticism of what Mr. Palmer
said in regards to how RFP’s were evaluated.
I just want to take you back seven or eight years when we were building
the Public Safety building. I’m sure
that much of the Public Safety building you put out RFP’s for the various
components such as door locks, such as roof top heating and ventilation
units. I’ve got to tell you if you take
a trip down there and look at what is going on it doesn’t look too good.
PALMER: But they weren’t RFP’s Dave. Those were all public bid projects.
MANNING: The WICKS Law actually required it.
PALMER: WICKS Law was in place with that, we had no
choice.
BLADES: I was just trying to make a statement that
qualified what I think sometimes we go above and beyond based on what our
perceptions are about various things and I just think that we have an RFP that
we went out on, we have a low bidder and to be honest right now I’m still not
sure which way I’m going to vote on this but I think it’s important that I vote
on what I feel inside of myself is the right vote and that sometimes is not
always the easy thing.
DOUGLAS: Dan has got
some things he wants to share with us but I’m going to go to Maggie. Anything Maggie you want to share with us and
then I’ll go to Dan and back to you Roby and then we’ll go to Dan and let Dan
follow up.
BARTLEY: I just want to say that I know Wells has done
a lot of work for us but Wells is not a monopoly and I like the idea of
competition. I think it’s good for our
county and I think often sometimes make it look like we always have a preferred
vendor and I think the RFP process has helped clarify that for us. I assume the county will continue to work
with Wells. Hopefully they are not going
to hold any grudge against us for this one bid.
If I do vote for Capital Digitronics because I think they are both fine
companies and we need competition in this county and I think competition is
good for all of us.
CONNELL: We have a low bid. I listened to all of the discussion and I’m
going to vote for the low bidder.
DOUGLAS: Anybody have any last statements?
POLITI: Yes I just was told that a representative
from Motorola was here. Does anybody
have a question for him? We heard from
Capital Digitronics. We’ve heard from
Wells. Does anyone have a question that
they would want to ask this gentleman if he would even speak given what is
heard? If I were him I would have left
by now but my understanding that our representative is here. We evidently have an agreement with Motorola.
DOUGLAS: Is there anybody here from Motorola that
would like to come forward? If we offer
the courtesy of the floor?
SCOZZAFAVA: I would move that courtesy.
DOUGLAS: I have to figure out who it is first.
SCOZZAFAVA: The guy with the Motorola sweater.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: If it behooves for me to speak. I would be happy to speak. I’m not with Motorola. I’m with Wells
Communication.
POLITI: Never mind.
DOUGLAS: Is there anybody from Motorola
specifically? Okay, nobody here.
Mr. Politi anything
more?
POLITI: No
FEREBEE: I find it hard to believe that you know
Motorola has got to be aware of this conversation. I mean everyone is reading it in the
paper. I’ve got emails from other radio
companies so it’s out there so I felt that if there was a concern or I feel
that Motorola would have had someone here today to address the board. I agree I don’t think they want to get in the
middle of who they are going to recommend or who they are not. I feel comfortable with Mr. McCabe. He said Motorola will communicate with
him. We are struggling with a budget,
with a 15% increase you know let’s start somewhere other than reducing the
supervisor’s mileage or something. I
mean it’s $26,000.
DOUGLAS: Mr. Manning is going to clarify some
correspondence that he thinks should happen with Motorola too.
HATCH: Mr. Chairman it’s my understanding we already
own the radios we bought them right? We
have all the radios in stock?
DOUGLAS: Yes they are
at the fire departments.
HATCH: Okay and I think Motorola has said what they
want. They want an authorized dealer
with a warranty service to install their radios. This is what they are saying here.
MARNELL: We have three options. We’ve got Wells. We’ve got Capital and we’ve got State
contract now we did advertise and we did get RFP’s which are fine but we do
have State contract if we chose to use the State contract price we have the
right to accept to reject. How do these
prices stand between Wells and Capital between the State contract?
DOUGLAS: I think Dan is going to answer that question
too when we get to it. That’s a good
question. Is there anybody else that has
questions? Then I’m going to turn it
over and let Dan Palmer go first and then I’ll let Dan Manning follow up.
SCOZZAFAVA: Just one quick question. I’m in favor of
awarding this to the lowest proposal these weren’t bids, these were RFP’s the
lowest proposal but the one question that bothers me is when this gentleman
said if Motorola works with him. I mean
that’s the question that hangs out there and I can’t believe that we can’t get
an answer. It’s a simple yes or no
question. If we award this contract to
this company will you provide the necessary whatever to work with them? And I know the letter Mr. Morrow that you are
referring to and that letter was kind of grey too the way that they explained
it.
MORROW: I’m going to tell you something right
now. I’m willing to hear from Dan and
Dan but after that I’ll tell you right up front we tabled this last week so we
could listen to Capital. You’ve got a good point Tom. I’m going to move to table after so that we
can hear from Motorola. We’re not going
to install these radios next week anyways so let’s table it after we hear from
Dan and Dan from Motorola.
DOUGLAS: I was going
to suggest the same thing Mr. Morrow. I
think it’s a good point and I think Dan is going to get into it a little bit
about the State contract and the letter that should probably come from one of
the three of us sitting up here to Motorola with specific questions and
concerns to answers so anybody else before I turn it over to Dan and then
Dan? Does anybody want to hear from Mr.
Jaquish?
SCOZZAFAVA: I do.
DOUGLAS: You do?
SCOZZAFAVA: Yes.
DOUGLAS: Let me go to Mr. Preston and then you can
offer the courtesy of the floor. Okay I’ll
come back to you.
PRESTON: I guess my last remark probably is going to
be if we’ve spent a couple million dollars with Motorola I would like to think
they would work with whoever this board directs as our installer.
CONNELL: Just a
comment I made at the last discussion at the rate that we are going with this
the warranty with Motorola is going to be over anyhow before we install these
radios.
DOUGLAS: Okay so you’re offering the courtesy of the
floor to Mr. Jaquish?
SCOZZAFAVA: Yes.
DOUGLAS: Nobody has any more questions for Mr.
McCabe? Mr. McCabe thank you very
much. You are free to go.
McCABE: Thank you Mr. Chairman.
DOUGLAS: Moved by Mr.
Scozzafava. Is there a second? Mr. Morrow.
All in favor signify by saying aye, any opposed – motion is
carried.
Mr. Jaquish can you
come on up please. You are free to make
a statement first before you answer any questions.
JAQUISH: My concern again – for one thing I’d like to
clarify something Mike Blaise is not configuring the radios. The template, the factory template we are
going to look at tomorrow but that template is for a multicast system which is
indeed different than other radio systems.
In saying that the question is will Motorola work with another vendor
and that I can’t answer right now. The
letter to me says no. It says you have
to be a Motorola service shop. My
concern is strictly on a neutral basis that we install these radios. The system doesn’t work and you’ve got to
remember these radios are like an orchestra.
They’re not just the radios in the vehicles they are talking with the
towers. This is like a tuned system and
I don’t want to see Motorola point a finger at Capital Digits or Capital Digits
pointing a finger at Motorola and that’s where my concern is. I do have a concern.
SCOZZAFAVA: As I think it’s obvious that many of us do. I
mean and that’s the question. I don’t
have the letter that we had here at Ways & means from Motorola but if I
recall that paragraph it said an authorized Motorola or it was grey, it wasn’t
definitive.
JAQUISH: I believe it said or they have an
agreement. If Motorola has an agreement
with another entity another vendor.
SCOZZAFAVA: Have you had conversations with
Motorola? Whoever Motorola is? Who the hell are we dealing with? The CEO here of Motorola? Who are we dealing with?
JAQUISH: The only conversation that I’ve had via the
request, via email for that letter.
SCOZZAFAVA: So why can’t you or the County Manager I
mean, one phone call – you’re saying no?
DOUGLAS: What we are going to do if we table this we
are not going to do it by a phone call.
I will call a special board meeting in December if need be but at first
one of the three of us will probably meet as we always do after meetings today
trying to figure out what we want for wording in there and input from you guys
to put in this letter to ask specific questions whether they work with whoever
but it’s a good point Tom. We will
clarify that.
SCOZZAFAVA: Thank you.
DOUGLAS: Anybody else on this side?
HARRINGTON: If we had
an option to utilize State contract why don’t we have some figures in regards
to that? We certainly wouldn’t have any
issues if we went on State contract as to who was qualified and who wasn’t.
DOUGLAS: I agree with you Mr. Harrington we probably
should of went with Mr. Palmer’s suggestion back in April and we wouldn’t be
sitting here right now but good point.
We can still look into that. That’s
a good point.
MORROW: The letter that Mr. Scozzafava and Mr.
Jaquish is referring to I have right here and I read it last week. It’s not that grey and I will read it, Motorola
does not warranty the installation, maintenance or service of the product by
anyone other than Motorola or an authorized Motorola service shop or warranty
center. That’s what Don just
said. That’s pretty clear. They will not so that’s what worries me.
FEREBEE: But once the radio is out of warranty we can have
anybody work on it anyway.
PALMER: No that has nothing to do with it.
FEREBEE: I know but that’s saying that they are not
going to warranty the installation or the service.
PALMER: Again I think there is confusion there. It has nothing to do with the warranty for
the radio itself. If you plug the radio
in and it doesn’t work that’s a Motorola warranty issue all by itself. What Motorola is saying they are not going to
warranty the installation if it’s not done by an Motorola authorized service
center.
FEREBEE: I wouldn’t expect them to.
DOUGLAS: Anybody else?
Go ahead Dan.
PALMER: And on the State contract I do not have the
price for State contract. It is
complicated to get a price on State contract because there are so many radios
and there are so many things involved in it but I can do that. When the board told me not to go to State
contract and to go out to RFP I didn’t do a price. If you want us to try and get a price on
State contract we can do that.
HARRINGTON: Do you have a timeline on that?
PALMER: I don’t know I’d have to talk to Linda about
how fast we can do it. At the time again
you have to understand there’s 400 radios and they are all being installed in
different vehicles and they are all being installed in different locations so
coming up with prices is complicated.
DOUGLAS: Anybody else?
Dan you have the last word.
MANNING: Oh boy, before you all fall asleep. Two points in my mind the two most salient
points here are number one, what’s the RFP process involve and how should your
analysis be structured? And number two,
maybe two should be one get all the facts so you know what you are talking
about. That’s what you need to do.
With a respect to an
RFP there are a lot of things that have been bantered around while cost is the
lowest cost; it’s the lowest cost that is not a determining factor with respect
to the RFP process although it is an important factor. It depends how the RFP is structured and how
the scoring is done. Often times if
there are ties or if there are close calls then price does come into play but
it’s not a determining factor. There are
such factors such as and I’m not saying, I don’t have a dog in this fight but
there are qualifications if you’ve got
firm that’s highly qualified and a firm that isn’t qualified then that
is assessed a certain number of points.
So when you keep saying lowest bidder, lowest bidder, lowest bidder that’s
important but it’s not the sole thing that you should use in making your
determination.
The second thing is
it’s very difficult to sit in this body and take in all this information, it’s
complicated and make a decision as to which way to go so what you have to do is
you have to rely on your people. You
have to rely on Mr. Palmer, you have to rely on Mr. Jaquish and you have to
rely most importantly in this case upon Linda.
I’ve never seen Linda skirt an issue or shade an issue so you may want
to speak to Linda or get some clarification from Linda as to why she determined
that Motorola was the successful RFP awardee.
She’s cognizant to the fact that the other group was lower but she
scored it and her scoring resulted in the contract being recommended for
acceptance to Motorola. If you’re going
to second guess her you should have all the facts and again, I’m not siding
with either on either side of this issue but those are the things that you need
to consider.
Then secondly you
need to get all the facts from Motorola.
You need to have in writing from Motorola a clear, concise response to
questions such as; can you work with this other organization? Will this other organization’s installation
void any part of our warranty or affect any part of our relationship? Things of that nature. Get that information and then make your
decision.
State contract it is
a very complicated process you have to go through seven computer screens to see
who’s on first so Dan can get that information that could have been used in
lieu of all of this so this is important to everybody involved. It’s important to Motorola. It’s important to
Capital Digitronics so I think you need more information.
Just as a point of
order also this isn’t on the floor it was tabled so you don’t have to do
anything. You know you don’t bring it
off the table and then table it again.
You can continue to have it tabled and then you can address it whenever
you want to. If that is your desire.
DOUGLAS: So with all due respect to my colleagues what
I would hope that by the end of today whatever questions that you may have that
you can email it onto the three of us so we can compile a letter to Motorola
outlying specifically your questions.
Dan’s got some that he wants to throw in there. I know Dan does too. We’ll compile a letter and once we have a
response back from Motorola we’ll call a special board meeting because I know
it’s important to all of you and some of the outgoing supervisors I want to
make sure that they have a say in this we can schedule a special board meeting
after we have that response back and Don if there is any questions that you
want included please email it to the three of us so that we can have that so we
can compile that letter.
Is that fair to
everybody? Is everybody on board with
that? Okay. Anybody have anything else for Mr.
Jaquish? Don anything?
JAQUISH: Again I believe in Linda’s point system and I’ll
back Linda.
DOUGLAS: Thank you very much. You know what? We’re doing our due diligence on behalf of
the taxpayers in Essex County. I will
leave it at that. I don’t think anybody
has any other guests that they want to bring forward? If not, we will move to resolutions.
RESOLUTION #352 –
AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO PURCHASE PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT IN
THE AMOUNT OF $5,920.00, FOR A CREATING HEALTHY PLACES GRANT IN THE TOWN OF JAY
– HENRY’S TRAIL PROJECT.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Douglas, seconded by Mr. Ferebee and Ms. Bartley
and adopted upon a roll-call vote as follows:
AYES: 2766 votes
NOES: 0 votes
ABSENT:
155 votes (Canon, Boisen,
Montgomery-Corey)
RESOLUTION #353 -
AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO APPLY FOR A NEW YORK HEALTH
FOUNDATION GRANT IN AN AMOUNT UP TO $50,000.00.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Blades, seconded by Mr. Harrington and adopted upon
a roll-call vote as follows:
AYES: 2766 votes
NOES: 0 votes
ABSENT:
155 votes (Canon, Boisen,
Montgomery-Corey)
RESOLUTION #354 -
AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO APPLY FOR A NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
COUNTY AND CITY HEALTH OFFICIALS (NACCHO) GRANT IN AN AMOUNT UP TO $40,000.00.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Morrow, seconded by Mr. Harrington and adopted upon
a roll-call vote as follows:
AYES: 2766 votes
NOES: 0 votes
ABSENT:
155 votes (Canon, Boisen,
Montgomery-Corey)
RESOLUTION #355 –
AUTHORIZING BUDGET AMENDMENTS FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Scozzafava, seconded by Ms. Bartley and adopted
upon a roll-call vote as follows:
AYES: 2831 votes
NOES: 0 votes
ABSENT:
90 votes (Canon, Boisen)
RESOLUTION #356 –
AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND/OR COUNTY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH
FRIENDS OF THE NORTH COUNTRY, INC.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Morrow, seconded by Mr. Connell and adopted upon a
roll-call vote as follows:
AYES: 2831 votes
NOES: 0 votes
ABSENT:
90 votes (Canon, Boisen)
RESOLUTION #357 –
AUTHORIZING APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND/OR COUNCILS.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Douglas and Ms. Bartley, seconded by Mr. Whitson
and duly adopted.
RESOLUTION #358 -
AUTHORIZING A THREE YEAR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF ONEIDA AND ESSEX
COUNTY RELATIVE TO ONEIDA COUNTY SHERIFF PROVIDING SECURITY SERVICES FOR ESSEX
COUNTY AT THE CENTRAL NEW YORK PSYCHIATRIC CENTER FORENSIC UNIT FOR THE TERM
JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY
CHAIRPERSON AND/OR COUNTY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE SAME.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Blades, seconded by Ms. Malaney and Mr. Marnell and
adopted upon a roll-call vote as follows:
AYES: 2831 votes
NOES: 0 votes
ABSENT:
90 votes (Canon, Boisen)
RESOLUTION #359 - OF
CONGRATULATIONS AND APPRECIATION TO DAVID JOHNSTON FOR HIS YEARS OF DEDICATED
SERVICE AS THE EDUCATIONAL INSTRUCTOR AT THE ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Connell, seconded unanimously and duly adopted.
DOUGLAS: Before
somebody moves on that I would like to ask somebody to give courtesy of the
floor to the Sheriff please? Moved by
Mr. Morrow, second by Ms. Bartley. All
in favor signify by saying aye, any opposed – motion is carried.
Sheriff please come
forward.
CUTTING: Thank you. The reason we’re here today is to
congratulate and show our appreciation to someone who has been very vital to
the Correction Facility. New York State
requires correctional facilities to provide educational services for anyone under
the age of 21 who does not have a high school diploma or GED. Now in that process through the years we’ve
had a lot of instructors come through the old correctional facility. At one point we were very fortunate to have
Mr. Johnston show up at our door and take over the services in the old jail and
any of you that had been there knew that was a drafty old building with a tiny
room and he walked in with a few books and did the best that he could do with
the inmate population we had. When we
transitioned into the new facility all of a sudden we brought him in and said
here is a big classroom. I’m not an
educator. You are. Build me a
program. He took the challenge and he
ran with it. He did a great job. He did a phenomenal job. He not only took those kids that didn’t have
their diploma he tutored the ones to keep them in school. He worked and ultimately we now have the
ability to give GED tests in the facility and to give GED certificates,
diplomas to these kids when they walk out the door which is huge in helping to
reduce recidivism. He has built a
program; he’s more than willing to work with the adult inmates that ask for
help. He’s gone well above and beyond
and it’s our loss that he’s decided to retire but through family circumstances
his wife has retired. He runs a farm in
Westport. He has a beautiful place down
there. We understand while we may be
able to fill the chair we’ll never be able to fill the shoes and what I wanted
to do was have a resolution of appreciation for Mr. Johnston here today from
the board and if possible I’d like to have him come up here and accept this.
DOUGLAS: Somebody
want to move that resolution? Moved by
Mr. Connell. Unanimous second. Do you want to read it Sheriff?
CUTTING: It says resolution of congratulations and
appreciate to David Johnston for his years of dedicated service as the
educational instructor at the Essex County Correctional Facility. Upon the recommendation of the public safety
committee, with the approval of the ways and means committee of this body, and
the same appearing proper and necessary.
Whereas, David Johnston has been the inmate GED instructor at the Essex
County correctional facility for the past ten years; and Whereas, David
Johnston has built a phenomenal program to provide educational services to
inmates with a GED or high school diploma; and Whereas, David Johnston has
exhibited the highest degree of skill and competence in performing his duties
and has conscientiously and with the highest degree of professionalism and
integrity served the residents of Essex County.
Be it resolved, that the Essex County Board of Supervisors, its Clerk of
the Board, County Manager and County Attorney hereby extend their heartfelt
thanks and appreciation to David Johnston for his dedicated, conscientious and
exemplary public service to the people of Essex County, and wish him continued
health and success upon his future endeavors.
This resolution was unanimously seconded and adopted.
DOUGLAS: You are welcome to say a few words Mr.
Johnston if you would like.
JOHNSTON: I would just like to say my appreciation from
Sheriff Cutting and his entire staff for what was in deed an opportunity in
addition to providing for the safety and wellbeing of his communities through
the law enforcement functions he’s always understood that these young men and
woman have not run out of a chance for a second chance and that they will
return to our communities and that we owe it to them and to ourselves to return
them better than they came and he provided me that opportunity to do that and
for that I am thankful.
MORROW: Mr. Chairman I would just like to say
something. It’s always good to put a
face with a name and Dave just retired when you did a resolution of appreciate
for his time serviced on the Essex County Soil and Water conservation district
board. Dave just retired from there and
I think the Sheriff put it very well, we filled the chair we are having a hard
time filling the shoes because when Dave made most all our meetings and when he
said something it really meant something to the committee. You know he really had heartfelt concern for
Essex County landowners and farmers. He
is a farmer as the Sheriff said so thank you and congratulations Dave.
DOUGLAS: Thank you Mr. Morrow. Mr. Johnston I had the privilege of riding
with the Sheriff to St. Lawrence county two weeks ago on a trip down there and
I want to tell you that he spoke very, very highly of you. Congratulations enjoy your retirement sir.
RESOLUTION #360 –
AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND/OR COUNTY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT WITH
ESSEX COUNTY SOIL AND WATER DISTRICT FOR A
TIMBER SALE.
The following
resolution was moved by Ms. Montgomery-Corey, seconded by Mr. Morrow, and
adopted, as amended.
DOUGLAS: Discussion?
MARNELL: Yes last month we mentioned we were going to
have him cruise the timber lot in North Hudson could that be included in this
resolution?
DOUGLAS: Will you repeat that question Mr.
Marnell? I’m sorry.
MARNELL: Last month or last week we discussed having
Dave go down and cruise the lot in North Hudson, the Town of North Hudson wants
to acquire. If we have him cruise it can
we include it in this resolution or should we include it in this resolution so
we don’t have to do it again?
DOUGLAS: It was tabled last week I believe.
GARRISON: The forest
lot in North Hudson. Yes it was.
PALMER: I don’t know that he needs to do an actual
timber review but he certainly can go in and do the review. I think if we just ask him I’m sure Dave
would do that.
DOUGLAS: Any further discussion? Before we have the
roll call –
MANNING: Do we know what the price is or anything?
DOUGLAS: Do you know the dollar amount Dan?
PALMER: I don’t.
I don’t think he ever said.
MORROW: It’s still
under discussion.
DOUGLAS: It’s still under discussion? Okay.
HARRINGTON: What was the question? What does he charge?
DOUGLAS: There’s no dollar amount within the
resolution and that’s what we need to figure out. It should be in the body of the resolution
but we haven’t got that so…
MORROW: We had a discussion at our soil and water
meeting and Dave threw out some idears and the soil and water committee, board
still hasn’t gave a decision of what it is going to be but you can bet it is
going to be quite a bit cheaper than what we’ve paid in the past because these
are tax dollars that are being used. We are looking to save money here and that’s
what we are looking at.
MANNING: Right and that’s just my point. I mean how do we know we are saving money if
we can’t compare it to something else?
MORROW: Well you will when you get the cost. When you get the price before he does the
work, let me put it to you that way.
SCOZZAFAVA: We don’t have a contract with Phil Sarkowski?
PALMER: No we had one with Fountain Forestry. Actually we didn’t renew. We were actually due to go back out to bid
but we didn’t because we didn’t think we had enough lots to do.
SCOZZAFAVA: Right okay.
MORROW: And Dave Reckahn knows what the Fountain
Forestry is and he brought that up at our meeting and it’s going to be
considerably less than that and to go back to North Hudson, he doesn’t have to
like Dan said he doesn’t have to go in there and scale it all he can go in
there and look and see approximately is there timber in there that’s worth
salvaging or has it been logged which we heard in the last ten to fifteen years
and it’s not worth it so that can be pretty easy not hardly any costs at all.
BARTLEY: I know I went through this same thing for our
town and when I checked with Fountain Forestry it was prohibited expensive and
then I’ve worked with Dave and it’s very reasonable.
DOUGLAS: Further comments or questions?
MORROW: I was just conferring with my colleague who’s
also on the Soil and Water board there was, you can go back and look at the
minutes of the meeting of soil and water there was a price per hour mentioned
but I hate to say it because it is not set in concrete right now but it is much
less, trust me than Fountain Forestry.
DOUGLAS: Without a dollar amount in there –
POLITI: It doesn’t make a difference.
DOUGLAS: It really does because I have a forester in
my town who is going to have issues with this.
I really believe that.
SCOZZAFAVA: Can we change execute, do an amendment to
negotiate?
DOUGLAS: I think negotiate is fair wording.
SCOZZAFAVA: I would so move that amendment.
MORROW: I will
second it.
DOUGLAS: All in favor of the amendment, any opposed –
motion is carried. So on the resolution
as amended all in favor signify by saying aye, any opposed – motion is carried.
RESOLUTION #361 –
ACCEPTING, ADOPTING, AND PLACING ON FILE POLICIES, PLANS, PROCEDURES AND ANNUAL
REPORTS.
The following
resolution was moved by Ms. Malaney, seconded by Ms. Bartley and Mr. Connell
and duly adopted.
RESOLUTION #362 – OF
CONGRATULATIONS TO THE 2013 AUSABLE VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL GIRLS VARSITY
VOLLEYBALL TEAM ON WINNING THE SECTION VII, CLASS C CHAMPIONSHIP FOR THE FORTH
CONSECUTIVE YEAR.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Douglas and Mr. Morrow, seconded unanimously and
duly adopted.
RESOLUTION #363 - AUTHORIZING PAYMENT TO HOLCOMBE
ABSTRACT FOR ABSTRACT OF TITLE AND TITLE SEARCH OF ADIRONDACK MOUNTAIN CLUB FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF ADIRONDACK LOJ BRIDGE IN THE AMOUNT OF $300.00, TO BE PAID
FROM BUDGETED FUNDS.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Politi, seconded by Mr. Ferebee and adopted upon a
roll-call vote as follows:
AYES: 2831 votes
NOES: 0 votes
ABSENT:
90 votes (Canon, Boisen)
RESOLUTION #364 - AUTHORIZNG PAYMENT
TO MOUNTAIN ABSTRACT COMPANY FOR ABSTRACT OF TITLE AND TITLE SEARCH SERVICES
FOR ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF OTIS BRIDGE IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $2,821.78, TO BE PAID FROM BUDGETED FUNDS.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Whitson, seconded by Mr. Scozzafava and adopted
upon a roll-call vote as follows:
AYES: 2736 votes
NOES: 0 votes
ABSENT:
90 votes (Canon, Boisen)
ABSTAIN:
95 votes (Bartley)
DOUGLAS: Under discussion?
BARTLEY: I think Dan Manning said last week that that
number was high?
MANNING: It is high and it says not to exceed and I
didn’t want to belabor this but I will make sure we get the right price.
RESOLUTION #365 –
SETTING THE DATE OF APRIL 30, 2014, FOR THE AUCTION DATE OF TAX SALE PROPERTIES
FOR THE TAX YEARS 2006, 2007, 2008 AND 2009.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Politi, seconded unanimously and duly adopted.
RESOLUTION #366 – OF
CONDOLENCE TO THE FAMILY OF ROBERT R. PURDY.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Ferebee, seconded unanimously and duly adopted.
RESOLUTION #367 –
RATIFYING CONTRACTS FOR NORTH COUNTRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Scozzafava, seconded by Ms. Malaney and adopted
upon a roll-call vote as follows:
AYES: 2831 votes
NOES: 0 votes
ABSENT:
90 votes (Canon, Boisen)
RESOLUTION #368 – OF
CONDOLENCE TO THE FAMILY OF CAROLYN B. WHITE.
The following
resolution was moved by Ms. Malaney, seconded unanimously and duly adopted.
RESOLUTION # 369 – IN
OPPOSITION OF THE USE OF ESSEX COUNTY’S NAME AND/OR SEAL BY NEW YORK STATE ON
PISTOL PERMIT RE-CERTIFICATION NOTICES.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Scozzafava, seconded by Mr. Whitson and duly
adopted with Ms.
Montgomery-Corey opposed.
DOUGLAS: Under discussion? All in favor signify by saying aye, any
opposed?
MONTGOMERY-COREY: I’m opposed.
RESOLUTION # 370 – AUTHORIZING THE
PURCHASE OF A MOBILE ASSESSMENT–GIS OUTPOST SYSTEM, SOFTWARE UPGRADE IN THE
OFFICE REAL PROPERTY TAX SERVICE FROM SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT GROUP A SOLE SOURCE
PROVIDER, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $11,415.00 FROM BUDGETED FUNDS.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Connell, seconded by Mr. Politi and adopted upon a
roll-call vote as follows:
AYES: 2831 votes
NOES: 0 votes
ABSENT:
90 votes (Canon, Boisen)
RESOLUTION #371 - OF
CONGRATULATIONS AND APPRECIATION TO DAWN BELDEN FOR 35 YEARS OF DEDICATED
SERVICE TO ESSEX COUNTY.
The following
resolution was moved by Ms. Malaney, seconded unanimously and duly adopted.
RESOLUTION #372 –
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF CHARGEBACKS.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Scozzafava, seconded by Mr. Morrow and Mr. Politi
and adopted upon a roll-call vote as follows:
AYES: 2831 votes
NOES: 0 votes
ABSENT:
90 votes (Canon, Boisen)
RESOLUTION #373 –
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 312 OF OCTOBER 1, 2007, AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSITION OF
PROPERTIES ACQUIRED BY ESSEX COUNTY IN ALL TAX SALE PROCEEDINGS.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Politi, seconded by Mr. Whitson and adopted upon a
roll-call vote as follows:
AYES: 2831 votes
NOES: 0 votes
ABSENT:
90 votes (Canon, Boisen)
DOUGLAS: Under discussion?
MANNING: Just for discussion purposes this is basically
the verbiage of Resolution #312 of October 1, 2007, with the exception of
paragraph c that says simultaneously and with the payment of back taxes by
the owner, the owner shall execute all documents necessary for the conveyance
of title form to the County of Essex to the property owner and shall also
immediately record the deed of conveyance with respect to the repurchase in the
Office of the Essex County Clerk and pay any and all transfer tax and recording
fees relative thereto. Mike and I
discussed this. He brought this up and
this just streamlines the process so we don’t have any lingering deeds out
there in the wind that don’t get recorded and become a problem later. I decided that this was best to add this to
the resolution rather than just have an amended floating out there so then you
don’t have to bring this piece and that piece and hook them together so this
will be the resolution that controls.
SCOZZAFAVA: This really isn’t pertinent to this
resolution but I guess it is in a way but some of these properties, the county
has foreclosed on all of these properties correct? 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
MANNING: And 2009 yes.
SCOZZAFAVA: And I’ve got one piece in Moriah that people
have been going into it and taking things off the property and so on, can we
post these properties? Legally can we
have the Sheriff’s department the county, someone?
MANNING: Post them for what Tom?
SCOZZAFAVA: No trespassing.
MANNING: Yes we can.
SCOZZAFAVA: I mean they are in there stealing copper and
anything and everything else so I just think that can the Sheriff do that or
the localities can go out and do it? But
some of these properties you know are in out of the way places and I think we need
to post them.
MANNING: All of them?
SCOZZAFAVA: No, no not all of them but we know which
properties in our town that we are having issues with. The Town of Moriah doesn’t own it the County
does I didn’t know if we can go in and post that or should the county go down
and post it?
MANNING: The county would do it unless they authorize
you to do it and everyone should make a list of property that they feel is
being abused.
SCOZZAFAVA: Okay thank you.
DOUGLAS: Further
comments or questions? Roll call vote.
RESOLUTION #374 - AUTHORIZING A
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN VERMONT ETV, INC. AND ESSEX
COUNTY TO ALLOW ESSEX COUNTY TO ADD TWO (2) ICE SHIELDS TO THE TOWER AT GRANDPA’S
KNOB.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Morrow, seconded by Mr. Preston and adopted upon a
roll-call vote as follows:
AYES: 2831 votes
NOES: 0 votes
ABSENT:
90 votes (Canon, Boisen)
RESOLUTION #375 - OF
CONDOLENCE TO THE FAMILY OF BILL DECKER.
The following
resolution was moved by Ms. Montgomery-Corey, seconded unanimously and duly
adopted.
RESOLUTION #376 – OF
GRATITUDE TO THE MURDIE FAMILY OF MINERVA.
The following
resolution was moved by Ms. Montgomery-Corey, seconded unanimously and duly
adopted.
RESOLUTION #377 – OF
CONGRATULATIONS TO PATRICK AND SHIRELY McNALLY.
The following
resolution was moved by Ms. Montgomery-Corey, seconded unanimously and duly
adopted.
RESOLUTION #378 - OF
CONGRATULATIONS TO THE 2013 MINERVA-NEWCOMB MOUNTAINEERS GIRLS VARISITY SOCCER
TEAM UPON WINNING THE NORTHERN SOCCER LEAGUE DIVISION III CHAMPIONSHIP.
The following
resolution was moved by Ms. Montgomery-Corey, who acknowledged that Mr. Canon
had also requested the resolution, seconded unanimously and duly adopted.
MONTGOMERY-COREY: Mr. Canon supports this as well.
DOUGLAS: Can you make a note of that as well Dan.
MANNING: Yes.
MONTGOMERY-COREY: He had asked me to take the lead on it. He definitely supports it.
RESOLUTION #379 –
AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF INVOICES RELATIVE TO THE ISSUANCE OF A $9,720,000
SERIAL BOND FOR THE RADIO PROJECT.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Scozzafava, seconded by Mr. Morrow and adopted upon
a roll-call vote as follows:
AYES: 2831 votes
NOES: 0 votes
ABSENT:
90 votes (Canon, Boisen)
RESOLUTION #380 – OF
GRATITUDE TO THE MANY VOLUNTEERS WHO HAVE COME TO THE AID OF THE 41 HORSES
WHICH WERE SEIZED DURING THE RECENT ANIMAL CRUELTY CASE IN ESSEX.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Blades, who acknowledge that Ms. Boisen has also
requested the resolution, seconded unanimously and duly adopted.
DOUGLAS: Mr. Blades have you reviewed all the names on
there to make sure we are not missing anybody?
BLADES: I’ve reviewed
the names but I can’t tell you if we’re missing anybody but I’d like to have
Sharon move this as a co-mover.
DOUGLAS: We will add some verbiage in there. I did talk to Sharon last night through an
email and she has an emergency situation with her mom or last night and Mr.
Manning will do some verbiage similar to what he did to the Minerva resolution.
BLADES: Thank you.
DOUGLAS: If you would too, if you could clarify it and
make sure that we are not missing anybody.
MANNING: We’ll add a catch all in the end also. I did not do that.
BLADES: I mean I see
my granddaughter on here. I never knew
she was involved but it’s one of those things.
There’s a lot of names here.
CONNELL: I was going to say I’m sure we are missing
some names because there are people that showed up in the beginning that I don’t
think ended up on the list but there’s no way you’re going to end up with every
specific name that was there.
DOUGLAS: Thank
you. Further comments or questions? If
you see any names or if you don’t see any names that you think should be on the
list please get that to Mr. Manning.
Resolutions from the
floor anybody have any resolutions from the floor? Mr. Scozzafava can we do the tax one
first? Is that which one you were going
to?
SCOZZAFAVA: No I had one of condolences.
DOUGLAS: Can I come back to you? Does anyone want to move the one on the tax
levy?
MORROW: I will.
Resolution adopting proposed Local Law No. 4 of 2013 entitled, “A Local
Law to override the tax levy limit established in General municipal Law §3-C”.
DOUGLAS: Moved by Mr. Morrow. Do I have twelve to allow that on the floor?
GARRISON: Yes you do.
RESOLUTION #381 -
ADOPTING PROPOSED LOCAL LAW NO. 4 OF 2013 ENTITLED, “A LOCAL LAW TO OVERRIDE
THE TAX LEVY LIMIT ESTABLISHED IN GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW §3-C”.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Morrow, seconded by Mr. Politi and adopted upon a
SIXTY PERCENT roll-call vote as follows:
AYES: 2730 votes
NOES: 101 votes (Preston)
ABSENT:
90 votes (Canon, Boisen)
DOUGLAS: Under
discussion?
MORROW: Under
discussion, people can vote no if they want to but I don’t see where we have a
choice the way our fund balance has been dwindling down and if we use all of
our fund balance to get it under the 2% than we are not going to have anything
left. I don’t even know if we have
enough fund balance to get under the tax levy cap?
SCOZZAFAVA: Yes what this is is just authorizing. It doesn’t mean you are going to vote to
override the cap. This just authorizes
the board to override it if that situation occurs and I’m not certain what the
consequences are if you don’t have this local law in place? Do you go to last year’s budget? Is there a penalty? I think there is a penalty imposed on the
following year’s budget?
PALMER: Absolutely.
Yes you would have to set up a reserve account to cover the amount that
you went over that you didn’t authorize.
SCOZZAFAVA: So again just for supervisors that may be
uncomfortable with this, this just authorizes us to override the final decision
will be made when we vote on the 2014 budget.
DOUGLAS: Wednesday we are meeting at 9:00 a.m. and if
need be all day.
SCOZZAFAVA: Correct.
MANNING: It just gives you that option. We do it every
year.
PALMER: Again the actual dollar amount of our cap
would have been $398,757 the chargebacks from the towns makes up $288,966 so if
you were in fact going to stay within the cap you could only raise the levy by
$114,000 which equates to .07%.
DOUGLAS: Further comments or questions?
CONNELL: Before Dan’s
presentation on the tentative budget I was going to vote no against this
resolution after hearing that, looking at the materials we had to take over on
this there is no choice from what I can see so I am going to vote for this even
though I am uncomfortable with it. I don’t
see any way we can put a budget together under the cap.
DOUGLAS: Anybody
else? Further comments?
PRESTON: I was going to keep my mouth shut but like
Jerry I normally can’t. I sat through
months of the budget committee meetings and I will say that I was educated to
the fact that we have people in this county that work their backsides off and I
was also educated to the fact that we have people that may not. In my opinion when we started with a 9%
increase that was talked about I think we could have gotten to the cap. I think it would have been painful. I agree I will say one thing I certainly do
not want the personnel issues that were brought into it last year because I
think we can do this and still play well with each other but in my opinion we
could have gotten there. I don’t think
it would have been easy. Everything that
Dan Palmer has said is 100%. Where we
differ is how we achieve to get there. I
mean I would of went along with some further cuts and the other thing that was just
eye opening to me was the fact of our contract agencies and how much
duplication of services is out there. It
was just totally shocking to me to find that out. In my opinion there was a reason this tax cap
was put into place and there’s a reason why our State legislature won’t budge
on it. The other thing that I will add
in everyone else’s defense it mystifies me that last year I think we talked
about a 26% tax increase and we had what, two people speak I think? This year 15% nobody come. It is just mind boggling to me so I
understand where everybody is going but in my opinion and I will respect
everyone else’s here I think we could have gotten to the cap. I thought probably I’m sure that would be a
slim chance that anyone would go along with that because what would have to be
done to achieve that but that’s my opinion.
I guess I’m going to stick with it. Thanks.
DOUGLAS: Further
comments or questions? Spending Dan I
emphasize again spending in this year’s budget compared to last?
PALMER: Again the net budget is down $1.3 million
from last year.
DOUGLAS: The
difference is the amount of fund balance that we had available to utilize last
year to offset the tax levy compared to this year? The six million down to?
PALMER: We used $6.8 million last year. We are only recommending that you use $3
million, $1.5 million out of Highway and $1.5 million out of general.
DOUGLAS: Further
comments, questions? Anything?
MANNING: I just want to reiterate as Tom said and it
is probably very clear but by passing this local law by does by no means mean
you are going to exceed the tax cap threshold.
This will just give you the ability should you want to.
HATCH: Question I have, do you feel that this
budget, there’s no way that this budget will be passed without having to go
over the tax cap? I mean there’s no
sound way this is going to happen?
PALMER: Well again my opinion is the problem right
now with the budget as the Comptroller’s have said to you is that it is
structurally unbalanced. The net budget
that we actually need to operate is so far off of what we are raising on the
levy that until you correct it structurally you are never going to get out of
the red.
HATCH: I mean if we vote for this and I vote for a
15% cap we are voting to give us a right to negotiate and see what we can come
up with?
DOUGLAS: That’s
correct. Wednesday at 9:00 a.m.
HATCH: No I will vote for it because I think we have
no choice.
DOUGLAS: Further
comments or questions? We will get in to
it on Wednesday but I have received emails and phone calls and I have spent a
lot of time with some of my constituents I would say like ten people and have
answered back their questions in lengthy emails and phone calls. I had a forty-five minute conversation with
two of my constituents last week on a conference call explained everything,
where we’ve been since 2004 and where we’re going and it takes some time to
educate our people. It is tough
times. I’m not sure where I am going
with this either on Wednesday but hopefully everybody will have a bunch of
suggestions come Wednesday.
MORROW: Well in my opening statements was and that’s
what gets me in trouble I don’t sugar coat things. I tell it like it is. There’s no way that we can get under the 2%
tax cap. There’s no way. We don’t have
enough – like Mr. Preston says we are going to go back and cut everything? We don’t have the fund balance. I’ve had people come into my office and talk
to me. I’ve had people from Clinton
County I’ve talked to when I meet them and I think the Public Hearing spoke for
itself. People understand that there is
a problem here and that’s when you said, explain it to your constituents. I explained it to my constituents. I’m not going to say that they are happy but
they understand. There has got to be
something done.
DOUGLAS: Another
thing that I know we are going to get into on Wednesday but State mandates in
this budget are what? Percentage
Dan? 83%?
PALMER: 83% of the net budget.
DOUGLAS: Of the net budget which are somewhere around
$24 million?
PALMER: Yes $23
million something.
SCOZZAFAVA: I’m going to support this local law which
will at least allow us the ability to override if necessary but there are ways
you can get to the cap and below the cap.
There are ways that people aren’t going to like. He just mentioned chargebacks. I mean right there could have brought you
well within the reason of getting within the cap. The solid waste system but we are going to
have all this discussion on Wednesday I’m certain. So call the question.
DOUGLAS: I will as
soon as anybody has any other comments or questions.
MORROW: You know I don’t want to get into a debate
with Mr. Scozzafava but what got us in this position is his ways. You know if you want to keep going I don’t
have a problem.
SCOZZAFAVA: I can
keep going. I can point out every budget
that we’ve adopted and I think you supported every one of them.
MORROW: I did because of your ways.
SCOZZAFAVA: Well I’m glad you listened to me.
DOUGLAS: Roll call vote please.
Further resolutions
from the floor?
SCOZZAFAVA: Resolution of condolences to the family of
Thomas Carpenter who passed away unexpectedly on Thanksgiving Day. He was a former school board member at Moriah
Central School also a former Town Assessor and has many family members that
actually work for Essex County. I’d like
to move that.
DOUGLAS: Thomas Carpenter?
SCOZZAFAVA: Yes.
Thomas Edward Carpenter.
DOUGLAS: Do I have twelve to allow that on the floor?
GARRISON: Yes you do.
DOUGLAS: Can I get a unanimous second? Thank you very much.
RESOLUTION # 382- OF
CONDOLENCE TO THE FAMILY OF EDWARD B. “TOM” CARPENTER, JR.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Scozzafava, seconded unanimously and duly adopted.
DOUGLAS: Further resolutions from the floor?
MARNELL: I’d like to have a resolution of appreciation
for Justice Jean Strothenke who will be retiring December 31 of this year. She was the Justice of the Peace for
twenty-five or so years for the Town of Schroon.
DOUGLAS: Do I have twelve to allow that on the floor?
GARRISON: Yes you do.
DOUGLAS: Can I get a unanimous second? Thank you very much.
RESOLUTION #383 – OF
CONGRATULATIONS TO HON. JEAN R. STROTHENKE.
The following
resolution was moved by Mr. Marnell, seconded unanimously and duly adopted.
DOUGLAS: Further resolutions from the floor? Any close in business Mr. Palmer
anything? Mr. Manning anything? We are adjourned.
As there was no
further business to come before this regular board meeting it was adjourned at
12:00 p.m.
Respectfully
submitted,
Judy Garrison, Clerk
Board of Supervisors